Wedding Traditions
All around the world we can find people celebrating
the passages from one stage of life to the next with some type of formal
ceremony. These ceremonies, such as
births, weddings, and funerals, usually incorporate special foods, rituals, and
clothing specific to the occasion celebrated. WEDDING TRADITIONS
is an
exhibition that explores the specific types of garments worn in marriage
ceremonies, including an historical examination of the traditional white wedding
dress worn in American and European weddings, as well as an overview of the
garments and surrounding traditions of several cultures represented in the
Historic Costume and Textiles Collection. Many people regard a cultural tradition as a practice
inherited from the past that is relatively unchanged and unchanging from
generation to generation. However,
a tour through this exhibition will demonstrate that the cultural traditions
surrounding wedding dress are not static and unchanging.
These traditions gradually evolve over time, as they are reinvented by
the people who use them.
Traditional wedding dresses as we think of them today
in America consist of a full-skirted white satin gown with high neck and sleeves
of lace, and a veil headdress, both trimmed with lace and pearls.
It is natural to assume that this style has been around for centuries and
worn by everyone, since it is the traditional style.
However, the style is reminiscent of what was worn only 150 years ago in
the mid nineteenth century. This
tradition, like many others, is not static and unchanging, or really very old.
The styles and colors of wedding dresses have varied according to the
fashions of the time, and the circumstances of the wedding.
Prior to the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901) women’s
wedding dresses traditionally followed the fashionable silhouettes and colors,
including white, of their day. The
white of choice for most brides was not a pure white, however, rather a cream or
ivory color which was more flattering to the complexion.

Ivory silk damask gown with leg-o’-mutton sleeves, c. 1830.
Worn by Elizabeth J. Porter at her marriage to Francis V. Noyes.
Purchased by Historic Costume & Textiles Collection.
Queen Victoria’s marriage in February 1840 is often
cited as the marker which began our white wedding dress tradition.
Her choice of a plain white satin dress and orange blossom wreath
headdress with lace veil was shockingly plain by royal standards and a
significant departure from the royal tradition of a dress embroidered with
silver and encrusted with jewels, a jeweled crown, and velvet robes trimmed with
fur. The Queen’s daughter,
Princess Alice, and the Princess of Wales were also married in white dresses
with orange blossom wreath headdresses in 1858 and 1863
Weddings were celebrated during the morning hours
until changes in Church law in 1886 allowed afternoon weddings. In keeping with
Victorian society’s modest propriety for daytime dress, necklines were high
and sleeves long. Wedding dresses
of many socially prominent brides were altered
for evening attire, or a second bodice was made for evening—one with a
lower neckline and no sleeves.
In 1861, Minister’s Gazette of Fashion
addressed men’s dress etiquette for weddings.
The proper ensemble included a frock coat of blue, claret, or mulberry, a
waistcoat of white, and trousers of pale drab or lavender doeskin.
Black was considered a color inconsistent with the occasion.
Wedding
dress styles generally followed the current fashionable daytime styles and were
worn with either a bonnet or veil. It
was not until the end of the 1860s, however, that veils were worn over the face.
Dresses could be white or colored.
Socially prominent brides wore white, while those of the working or artisan
classes wore a new ‘best’ dress which was usually a more practical color
than white, and worn for more than one occasion.
When in mourning, brides could wear a black, gray, or lavender color
dress.

Black silk taffeta wedding gown of Maggie Wilson Scott,
September, 1881.
Gift of Lorna Scott Payne.
According to Mary Elizabeth Sherwood in The
American Code of Manners of 1884, “young ladies who marry widowers often
dress in colored silks, and with a bonnet, or not, as they please.”
At afternoon weddings, many brides chose to get
married in their going-away dresses, which were often practical traveling suits.
|
|
Above:
Brown silk satin wedding gown from Vaughan family, c. 1894.
Gift of Marcia Hansen Drayer.
By the end of the 19th century, men had become less
colorful in their fashionable as well as wedding attire.
During the 1880s, a morning coat or cutaway of dark blue or black was
worn with gray trousers and tie and a white waistcoat.
The frock coat returned in the 1890s, but only in black.
These garments may reflect the time of day the wedding occurred.
The morning coat was considered formal morning-time attire, while the
frock coat was considered a formal style of men’s dress for the afternoon.
Tailcoats were only for evening wear, and therefore not appropriate for
weddings, while the tuxedo was not established as a form of men’s wear until
the late 1880s, and then, only for informal occasions.
The new lounge or ‘sack’ suit was considered
casual attire for gentlemen of upper classes, however, it was considered best
dress for rural classes and laborers and worn by grooms for weddings of that
socio-economic level.
After the turn of the century, the white wedding dress
tradition was firmly established, and further embellished by the Edwardians with
an abundance of lace and pearls. Wedding dress styles of the early twentieth century continued
to follow fashionable dress silhouettes, including the short flapper dress
popular in the 1920s, and the bias cut fashions of the early 1930s.
The romantic and historical epics of the cinema, featuring glamorous
evening and exotic historical styles also influenced wedding dress designs.
In addition to the fashionable bias cut gowns, medieval and victorian
styles were also available.
Around the turn of the century, proper gentlemen’s
wedding attire consisted of a frock coat, striped trousers, and a light
waistcoat. The morning coat or
cutaway regained popularity by 1910, and was in widespread use after WWI.
Working men wore a dark suit,
which eventually gave way in the 1930s to a formal suit, or tuxedo, often rented
for the occasion.
The pure white wedding dress was firmly established by
late 1930s, replacing the ivories and creams that had passed for white over the
previous fifty years. White wedding
dresses from this point on were generally not meant to be worn for any other
occasion, they were specifically made for the wedding ceremony.
Fashionable silhouettes as well as historically revived styles were
popular, interrupted briefly by the war which had an affect on wedding dress
styles. Brides, often out of
necessity and sometimes out of patriotism wore practical suits or short day
dresses during the wartime years. Wedding ceremonies often depended on when the groom could get
a furlough or leave, and these were often scheduled on very short notice.
Although there were shortages of some materials
shortly after the war, there was an abundance of parachute materials, either
through army surplus or as the result of wartime souvenirs. The two examples in
this exhibition include a dress made from a German silk
|
|
Lt. Matt Luoma sent his wife Lillian a nylon parachute from
France during WWII. In April 1945,
Lillian entered the Fifth National Sewing contest sponsored by the Cleveland
Press , and won first prize in the Victory Group for this negligee and gown
made for a belated honeymoon. The
design incorporates the original parachute seaming in the skirt of the negligee.
Gift of Lillian Kinnune Luoma.
|
|
Betty Green’s wedding dress made from a silk parachute
brought back from Germany by her husband, Edwin Morgan Jr., at the end of WWII.
Made for $18.00 by John Parva, a tailor from Warren, OH.
The manufacturer’s label with Luftwaffe insignia is still visible in
the train of the dress, 1946.
Gift of Edwin Jr. and Elizabeth Morgan.
Historically revived wedding fashions were popular at
the end of the twentieth century, interrupted by a period of diminished ritual
and formality in the 1970s. The
majority of historic styles were based on Victorian or Edwardian fashions of the
late 19th or early 20th century. The
predominant historical styles of the late 1960s were those with high waists,
reminiscent of Regency or Empire fashions of the early 19th century.
Non-traditional styles flourished during the anti-establishment 1970s. All forms of ritual and formality were greatly diminished, giving way to weddings customized by the bride and groom. Outdoor settings replaced formal Churches, garlands of daisies replaced veils, and the bride and groom wrote their own vows. Structured dresses of lace and tulle were replaced by loose and simple, back-to-nature peasant smocks and hooded caftans.
|
|
Wedding of Jill St.Coeur and Richard Ray, Northfield, MA, 1970.
During the 1970s, men’s wedding attire was once
again colorful and less staid. Traditionally
feminine
Lady Diana Spencer’s wedding to Prince Charles in
1982 brought a rebirth of fantasy to wedding ceremonies.
The real-life princess wore a Victorian style dress befitting a
fairy-tale princess. The
large-sleeved, fitted bodice, full-skirted silhouettes of Victorian revival
style gowns are the epitome of the traditional white wedding dress.
Weddings are a universal rite of passage, a process
which requires one to separate from the old, pass from the old to the new, and
finally, become a part of the new. The
rituals and traditions for this process vary from country to country.
Some cultures’ wedding ceremonies take place over a period of several
days and involve several changes of clothing.
The changes of clothing often represent the change in social status of
the bride or groom. Sometimes the
clothing changes reveal traditions and practices adapted from other cultures via
trade, migration, or colonization.
Western fashion has influenced the style of dress of
many non-western cultures, in some areas replacing the traditional dress
entirely. Wedding celebrations are
sometimes the only places where a semblance of a culture’s traditional dress
survives. Several countries
incorporated the white wedding gown into their wedding traditions during the
early and mid twentieth century. One
can find a synthesis of western fashion and traditional dress in wedding attire,
either through the style of dress, type of fabric, or style of accessories.
Although the white wedding dress tradition of Western
culture can be found among the wedding traditions of several places where
Europeans and Americans had influence, there has been a rebirth in cultural
identity and a resurgence of interest in traditional wedding dress.
Contemporary versions of traditional wedding clothes are often in great
demand, and worn in addition to or instead of the white wedding dress.
|
|
Wedding dress of hand-embroidered pineapple cloth (piña)
from The Philippines, with traditional butterfly sleeves worn by Aida Solita M.
Saddam at her marriage May 14, 1966 in San Marcelino, Manila, Philippines.
Gift of Alma Saddam.
In several Asian countries, wedding ceremonies share a
common Confucian tradition, and common traditions regarding color.
Many traditional wedding costumes incorporate the color red, since it is
an auspicious and happy color. White,
on the other hand, is the traditional color of death and mourning.
In the past, Japanese brides would wear a white kimono on the first day
of the marriage ceremony to symbolize their separation or “death” from their
birth family.
In both Korea and Japan, weddings have become a
prosperous business with a steady clientele.
Both cultures view marriage as a necessity to enter into adult society.
The marriage ceremony changes reckless youths into responsible adults.
Traditional Korean bridal dress is based on the
costume of royal princesses. The
red skirt and yellow jacket are worn over full pantaloons and a long slip, and
under a red robe with wide rainbow stripe sleeves. The headdress consists of a beaded crown with a dragon head
pin in lacquered hair.
The groom wears a royal blue robe of a style worn by
officials in dynastic times, with a stiff black hat asociated with scholar’s
or officials. A western style shirt
and tie are worn under the robe.
|
|
Traditional Korean wedding costume.
Traditional Korean weddings and wedding dress fell out
of favor during Korea’s rapid industrial growth and emergence onto the world
marketplace in the 1970s and 1980s. In their place was a modern, new style
wedding with Korean vernacular language, and western style dress. Many
ceremonies today feature both traditional and modern forms of dress.

Traditional Japanese wedding dress.
The wedding costume of rural agricultural areas does not usually display an abundance of fine silks and other rich materials, however, that is not to say that these costumes are devoid of decoration. In fact, the wedding dress in several Middle Eastern and Eastern European cultures was highly elaborate, and regarded as a means of displaying the bride’s dowry. The traditional bride’s dress consisted of several layers embroidered and decorated by the bride, and often trimmed with coins or accessorized with an abundance of metal and jewelry.
|
|
Macedonian bridal costume from Bitola region.
In an interest to re-affirm their cultural heritage, many Africa-Americans incorporate aspects from Western African cultures into their wedding traditions. This often includes items of dress, and can feature authentic garments and accessories from a West African country, garments or accessories based on traditional African dress, or accents to western style garments made from traditional West African textiles such as kente or asooke cloth.
|
|
Early twentieth century Palestinian traditional wedding dress or thob malakeh (queenly dress), from the area near Bethlehem. This style of wedding dress was replaced by western style dress in the urban areas as early as the late nineteenth century, and by the 1930s in rural regions. Today, a more modern version of this style of dress is worn as a re-affirmation of cultural pride by some Palestinian brides.
|
|
This exhibition is made possible through the Lena
Bailey Endowment for the Historic Costume and Textiles Collection, and with the
help of the following:
Don Callander and Callander Cleaners
Jeanie Zofkie and Lazarus Bridal Salon, for
contributions of wedding veils, petticoats, and bouquets.
The Honda Family Center and Etsuko Ichijo, Takako
Shibata, and Mariko Hyuga for helping dress our Japanese wedding kimono.
All the donors and lenders to the exhibition.
The Department of Consumer Sciences, and
the College of Human Ecology.
Exhibition preparators: Harriet McBride, Amanda Thompson, Amy Stapleton, Peter
Aguirre, Dilia Lopez-Gydosh, Susan Hannel, Jaeil Lee, Erica Tiedemann, and
Patricia Cunningham.